• F04118F@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    Mig-31 had a major engine fire

    Isn’t that the normal operating state of the Foxbat family?

    Tap for explanation

    MiG-25 engine service life is 150 hours, MiG-31 300 hours. These engines are essentially burning themselves to death constantly. For comparison: the 🇨🇵Rafale engine, the Snecma M88-2, has a time between overhauls of 3000 hours, and is designed for a service life of 6000 hours.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fun fact for the MiG-25: The engine lifespan is that low because it literally uses a pair of cruise missile engines. They’re built to be used once. I can’t speak for the MiG-31, though.

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      Americans built the sr71, a plane that goes mach 3 and above. Russians build the foxbat, a rocket that goes mach 3 and above.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      The MiG-31 is only good at one thing: speed. That bad boy can intercept damn near anything but it can’t turn on a dime or go too fast unless shear forces tear its wings and airframe off. It’s pretty much a cool looking paper tiger.

      • DogWater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are you thinking of the mig 25? The foxhound was supposedly much more capable at low speed than the foxbat. Genuinely curious

        • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Crap I think you’re right. They look damn near identical to each other. I don’t know what the MiG-31 could do better than its older counterpart.

          • DogWater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            So I was curious because I genuinely had that mixed up when reading the thread, so I watched a quick documentary about the foxhound. It is extremely similar because it’s derived directly from the fox bat platform. The mig 31 is an interceptor fighter. It’s still extremely quick, but not as quick as the fox bat. It could hit mach 2.5 and could intercept the sr 71 if it was pushing hard apparently, especially given that a missile could reach out and touch the blackbird if required.

            The biggest difference I learned was that the 25 was all go and nothing else, whereas the 31 was slower to allow for more capabilities. The changes that they made for the 31 allowed it to be somewhat successful as a fighter as well at lower speed.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        This seems like a fantastic example of “if a metric becomes a target, it fails in being a metric”.

        • Aqarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Eh, it works for what it is. The whole plane is basically a manned stage-1 of an AA missile.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Impressive. I find it difficult enough to do while driving! And my passengers complaining also makes it difficult to focus…

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Crashing a plane can be stressful so hats off to his copilot for thinking on his feet and relieving some of that stress.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m sorry, but Ivan managed to pull off quite a feat. He wasn’t beating around a bush and came through.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The flight suit pressure-squeeze + the plane banking on 3-jizz makes it a truly unique experience.

        (Dang, ngl, that sounds something you def need to kinda try given the chance.)

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “I tried to put it out— but a tablespoonful of semen was just no match for the ferocity of that engine fire… At the speed of Mach 3, it was difficult to direct the ejaculate after I opened the cockpit and I lost the load. Most of it all over my helmet. At that point I could no longer read my instrumentation”

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This cumerade cumed & cum-flooded the cum-engines with too much cum and they went into uncumtrolled after-cum-burner mode that eventually overcumed everything and the cumjet just melted & climaxed in a great cum-ball explosion.

    I’m glad the cummer lived to ejaculate in anther plane.

  • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, I respect his resourcefulness but a teaspoon of skeet isn’t going to put out an engine fire:o

  • console.log(bathing_in_bismuth)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    OP is not an certified NCD member.

    Like I couldnt care less but TPM claiming into NCD is fucking BS. Everybody is an NCD member but not TPM. Gatekeeping? No true Scotsman? Salty? It could be any of those. I don’t care.

    -edit- this is like generally accepted but not really core NCD contenylr, by a power user. This should not have the attention it has.

    But it is (fortunately) not up to me what is OK and what not. But I am gonna point it out anyway.