• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are tons of open messaging protocols that have been replaced by closed ones. For instance, Discord shouldn’t be a thing since IRC exists, but Discord exists and is very successful.

    For some reason, likely tied to how it is used, email survived as an open protocol.

    • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For instance, Discord shouldn’t be a thing since IRC exists, but Discord exists and is very successful.

      IRC lacks a massive amount of features that discord users typically want. Screensharing, VCs with group and camera support, built-in history (don’t need to use a bouncer like on IRC), built-in online GIF searcher and sender with one click, huge community of bots that use discord’s API to do anything from games to moderation.

      It isn’t even close.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        ICQ and AIM managed to draw a huge crowd in the early (ish) days of home Internet.

        It’s not about features…it’s about ease of use.

        Also, IRC wasn’t as decentralized as email to begin with, there were several isolated networks that would not communicate with each other (dalnet, EFnet, undernet, etc)