Optional@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 1 month agoYep. Mmm Hmm. AhYhup.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up1199arrow-down10
arrow-up1199arrow-down1imageYep. Mmm Hmm. AhYhup.lemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square22linkfedilink
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month agoI already have you tagged as “incorrecting me” from an earlier exchange where you did the same thing here… https://purplesec.us/learn/responding-to-phishing-emails/#%3A~%3Atext=What+Happens+If+I+Reply%2Cphishing+attacks—so+never+reply. Just accept that sometimes people have ideas that are different from yours that hold value? It doesn’t add value to the discussion to just give anecdotal evidence while you refuse other people’s ideas.
minus-squareSam@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoneither of you provided evidence. and what the hell is “incorrecting” somebody??
I already have you tagged as “incorrecting me” from an earlier exchange where you did the same thing here…
https://purplesec.us/learn/responding-to-phishing-emails/#%3A~%3Atext=What+Happens+If+I+Reply%2Cphishing+attacks—so+never+reply.
Just accept that sometimes people have ideas that are different from yours that hold value? It doesn’t add value to the discussion to just give anecdotal evidence while you refuse other people’s ideas.
neither of you provided evidence.
and what the hell is “incorrecting” somebody??