Galactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-22 days agoLet's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up170arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
arrow-up164arrow-down1external-linkLet's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Optionblog.edwardloveall.comGalactose@sopuli.xyz to Opensource@programming.dev · edit-22 days agomessage-square6linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programming@programming.dev
I was curious about your opinions (Not my article). Also this mentions Fossil & Pijul. Which are fully-fledged Git-Alternatives
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoPartially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.
Partially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.