A great example of lying with headlines (i.e., the headline doesn’t match the content of the article, exploiting the fact that many people won’t read the article but will take the headline as a summary). The article presents several industry datasets that show strong “Buy Canadian” trends still in effect and only weak, vague anecdotal evidence of this effect waning; specifically, “Ms. Goel is one of many Canadian business owners who told The Globe and Mail that enthusiasm for buying Canadian has waned.”
Carney, The Globe and Mail, and much of corporate Canada want to tell us that Canadians are open to buying American. @#$% off. We’re boycotting for obvious reasons
A great example of lying with headlines (i.e., the headline doesn’t match the content of the article, exploiting the fact that many people won’t read the article but will take the headline as a summary). The article presents several industry datasets that show strong “Buy Canadian” trends still in effect and only weak, vague anecdotal evidence of this effect waning; specifically, “Ms. Goel is one of many Canadian business owners who told The Globe and Mail that enthusiasm for buying Canadian has waned.”
Carney, The Globe and Mail, and much of corporate Canada want to tell us that Canadians are open to buying American. @#$% off. We’re boycotting for obvious reasons