Love how they use “lend” then act surprised that they owe money. Unless they have their own magical definition of “lend”, which wouldn’t be surprising.
They are referencing some weird doc that mis-defines “lend” as including “compensation” and then referencing some much more accurate legal definition of compensation to argue that “lending” you money means that both parties are mutually indebted. The problem is that lending money absolutely does not count as compensation. Idk what doc they are referencing, but it looks like sovcit propaganda bullshit.
deleted by creator
Um, not a US Treasury bond though. I would not recommend those at this particular juncture.
Well until demented rapist started his march to federal default it was pretty good.
deleted by creator
