Current and former employees of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are calling on Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to resign, warning that job cuts and proposed funding reductions will hurt the agency’s ability to protect the public from future health outbreaks.

  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is what needs to be happening everywhere. Definitely something that should be applauded. Is anyone taking up a collection to help fund and cover these people who are taking actual risks right now?

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 days ago

      Precisely. Is there anything like the Minnesota Freedom Fund for protestors in LA, for example? The Minnesota Freedom Fund was indispensable during the George Floyd protests in helping release people on bail that would have otherwise been stuck in jail awaiting trial and could not afford to get bailed out.

      There needs to be donations to all kinds of groups at the moment to support those who are risking it all and taking direct action, whether they are protestors in the streets or protestors in the government risking their jobs or walking out of their jobs.

    • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      Peaceful protests will not work at all, even if properly funded. And non peaceful protests will probably things worse. Full rebellion will just break things not fix them.

      Only the democrats winning again and really fixing up things will work.

      But during the Biden administration, the democrats with both chambers of congress and the presidency failed to adequately fix most damage from the first Trump administration.

      It’s hard to adequately express how fucked things are. There are no solutions that liberals will accept

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Do you have any evidence of this? If so you should write your own article. Literally an someone that thought the same as you looked into things and found otherwise. The article was just posted for it. look forward to seeing your research and reasoning on the subject.

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I finally saw your link in the text, it did not show up in the response very clearly , and only saw it when I viewed here again.

          I don’t think that article is relevant to my opinion which is that no protest whether peaceful or violent can undo the policy changes.

          But think some protests can help rescue people from being kidnapped, but that is not a change undoing the sabotage of vital institutions.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            I had a bit of a brain fart and hit wrong button posting before I had fully written. That’s on me not on you.

            And yes protesting isn’t going to change policy directly. Only new policy will change policy. But protests often leads to new policy.

            They’re going to look for every reason to discount and disregard protests however. Specifically highlighting any small instances of violence. And specifically because it can change policy eventually.

            • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              But protests often leads to new policy.

              If the leadership is either democratically elected or authoritarian. Here, it is neither, but instead a mishmash of things that do not respond much to protests of any type . At most protests will lead to superficial changes

            • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The violent ones will only reduce people in threat of round ups to concentration camps, those are vital to have and I think more us needed.

              The topic here was undoing sabotage to critical resources and other changes like that.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        What happened in the last six months that makes you think Democrats will do shit if they get power back? Or even the last decade?

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree, which is why I think the one working solution has critical issues and will not work.

          The Democratic Party would have to be reformed from the ground up, which requires things and behaviors which are not possible in the USA right now

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Then let me come from a different angle: we don’t need Democrats. Not as a group, anyway. I’m fine with individual members, like AOC, but the party as a whole hasn’t been on our side. That won’t change.

            Instead, we should be looking to build solidarity with unions and community. If Democrats exist at all at that point, they’ll be forced to deal with a very different political reality.

            Edit: fixed some wording.

            • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I agree with you on your points except I do not see how it works. Americans lost the ability to form new parties or organizations at the local level . It will be a long hard road to learn it again. And I’m sure they will… eventually decades from now

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                The current situation will tend to sweep away a lot of institutions. The Republican Party almost certainly won’t survive Trump, and there’s a chance Democrats won’t either. Even if they do, it’s not like they could hold on to being a singularly dominant party forever. Not when there are so many people voting for them only to make sure Republicans don’t take power.

                They’ll have to adapt to that situation or perish. New political parties can spring up quickly. We’re not used to that in the US, but it’s happened here before, and happens around the world all the time.

                • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t think this will happen soon in the USA.

                  This is because the USA is a complex web of non democratic institutions posing as the real deal, and most people seem fine with that.

                  Secondly, Americans as a group do not know how to recognize or understand when there is massive cheating by political parties, and seem incapable of applying standard checks or common sense. Whoever wins at the state or federal levels are incapable of changing the systems . Some states are actually real democracies but this is lost on the majority of people. As a group and culture this is set in stone and cannot change but slowly.

                  Thirdly, Americans went through two generations of mass migrations and job changes, local politics and grassroots are broken because of this. And will take years to recover. Political parties must be done at the local level.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure they will, but everybody has to do it. If the economy ground to a halt, people couldn’t go to the grocery store, couldn’t fly, no rail or goods moving across the country. You better believe it would work. Its the most nonviolent way to end this craziness. But it requires coordination.

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          People absolutely can be that dysfunctional on a large scale. There is no current coordination from a central point or collective of like minded people. And there is no guarantee such will develop. There are many countries this is true

      • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This reads just like a domestic abuse victim defending their abuser.

        The democrats aren’t going to fix this and have no intention of making anything better for you and me. Giving them “just one more chance” isn’t the answer.

        • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m saying a functional Democratic Party is the only solution, it does not exist. No amount of violence or peaceful intentions will change that

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I understand it’s easier said than done but I hope many noble bureaucrats hang onto their positions for as long as possible and do whatever they can to maliciously resist. Anyone who leaves will be replaced with someone far worse, sadly.

  • LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Editor’s note: This article has been updated with comment from HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon.

    Axios should know better than to publish propaganda