How are you going to accomplish this when there is a disagreement on what is true. “Fake News”

Don’t forget his ex-wife is now shagging Don Jr.

Marines and soldiers, don’t let them use a partially incorrect fact to attack you.

Also it would be libel, not slander anyways.

A jump host is just a system that serves as an exit point into the restricted network. You can do this with Ubuntu desktop but you need to figure out how you are going to jump into your host. Others have mentioned tail scale and head scale as options for doing this. Tailscale would be an example of an agent based adhoc vpn solution; this would place a dependency on an external provider to host a connection broker service and use an agent that periodically checks into the broker service for connection requests. Headscale would be the self hosted option and you would need to forward a port into your network and you should guard it with a reverse proxy.

Good point about network availability and endpoints.

Since I have no patience, I’ll lay out some items for consideration.

1st, I wouldn’t rely on an ISP router to serve as my end point for a VPN. They likely have access to manage that device and it likely isn’t getting any updates. You are better off implementing it with your own equipment that you keep updated.

If you have a capable security device serving as your router to the external internet and you want full access to your internal network, then you might consider using a VPN that terminates at your router.

I myself am a fan of setting up a jump host and initiating a VPN connection directly to that host when using an agent based solution. Then you can monitor the host for activities, more easily keep your edge device patched, and then use the capabilities of your jump host to interact with the rest of your network. This would require either an agent to periodically poll a platform for connection requests or another form of ingress into your network.

Expand on your use case. Why/what do want to access on your local network when you are not there?

deleted by creator

I don’t see any explanation of why he was trying to blend in with the crowd while injured and hiding his weapon in his backpack. Why didn’t he work with the protest group to get on their protection detail.

Hmm interesting to learn, thank you for sharing. I still contend that it shouldn’t be coward going to coward. It should be a verb for the last word as it is in Haters going to Hate. I am not familiar with coward being used as a verb.

Alex Lace according to a reverse image search. No real idea who he is.

The verb form is cower. Apparently not.

Why do they get a second deadline to respond to the request?

I think it is defined as they are protected in travel to, from, and while sitting in formal sessions, not official duties.

Snippet from the constitution.

They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

The article does mention the 50 billion dollar figure about actual theft, but the headline and the majority of the article are discussion the suppression of wages.

I would contend that using hyperbolic language like this only serves to provide an easy excuse to dismiss the topic being discussed. Most people will not consider this as stolen money because the wage was agreed upon. Yes, I agree with the position that our system doesn’t afford workers the power and resources they need to be on an equal footing when negotiating salary. I agree that such an imbalance in negotiating power is coercive. The title should be, “Employers have suppressed the growth of wages by 50 trillions dollars since 1975”.

But it is only 6. Crunchy vs smooth doesn’t taste any different.