Basically a deer with a human face. Despite probably being some sort of magical nature spirit, his interests are primarily in technology and politics and science fiction.
Spent many years on Reddit before joining the Threadiverse as well.
It costs so much to make an AAA game these days that it must earn an enormous amount of money to be profitable, which means it needs to appeal to as broad a market as possible, which means nothing niche or unusual. I think movies are having the same problem.
Is it cheating to say AI and humanoid robots?
Anti-aging tech, if so.
Crypto can be anonymous, if you use the right cryptocurrency and do things correctly. “Crypto” is a very broad term. Different cryptocurrencies have different functions and purposes.
Ah, so that’s what those two swellings on her chest are.
I feel like the Trump administration has moved beyond scandals at this point. Scandals are just the ocean in which it swims. The emoluments clause is dead, buried, and completely forgotten. Other parts of the constitution are still hanging around in tatters, people are noticing some of that, but run of the mill scandal is not relevant.
This one hasn’t passed yet, when it does it’ll bring whole new levels of mockery.
Well, the Germans wouldn’t have because they got defeated long before the Manhattan Project produced a usable weapon. Their own attempt at it failed. Some suspect that Heisenberg actually did sabotage the German project, though it’s also possible that he was just bad at it.
But the Soviet Union would have done it later on. Or any of a variety of other countries that probably shouldn’t be the first or only countries to have nuclear weapons. Science is not unique to the discoverer, other people can independently discover the same things.
And not only that, Israel has nuclear weapons.
When there’s an organic-looking decline that seems like a good sign, but the sudden sharp drops seem likely a sign of “corporate oversight” and not an actual improvement.
How do you do that without screening calls through the AI.
You don’t, which is why they’re planning to try using AI to do it.
I honestly don’t understand why you’re asking. It’s like there’s an article about how a transportation company is investigating the use of teleporters to improve their delivery time and someone’s responding with “but how will they do that without teleportation?”
Did you read the article? The reason they’re looking into this is because they’re not able to run an excellent human 911 service, they can’t hire enough people to handle the volume of non-emergency calls that are coming to the emergency line.
It’s the Register, ranty articles written like a teenager is kind of their brand.
Damned illegal alien criminals. They’re not sending their best.
On the one hand, I hate seeing people scammed.
On the other hand, it’s nice that they have less money to spend on political donations.
That’s what the test will ultimately determine.
And next community over there’s yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com, who continuously illustrate the capricious and hateful nature of many human moderators.
I say give AI a chance at it and see what happens. If it works, great. If it doesn’t, people will just go elsewhere.
Unlikely. AI is cheaper than humans, that’s the whole point. And you have no idea how well it’ll be able to do the job. Neither do they, which is why they’re planning a test first.
The problem with that kind of thing is always “who decides what’s hate-filled and false?” If there was a Federal government mechanism for that in the United States it would now be in the hands of Trump and the Republicans.
Early analysis suggests that one of the high-pressure nitrogen gas tanks in the cargo bay ruptured. This would be unrelated to the rocketry aspects of Starship, those tanks are pretty plain vanilla technology and if this is actually what happened it’s weird because those tanks are rated for way higher safety margins.