Why, a hexvex of course!

  • 2 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle







  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldTeachers Are Not OK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ll extend this further - students are also not ok.

    What I’ve observed this year is that a lot of students are opting for AI taught methods, or asking AI to summarise course materials for them. They then make bad copies into their notes, conflate these methods with those taught in class, then fail hard when an open note exam comes around.

    The truth of the matter is we’ll see a post-AI degree lose its value against a pre-AI degree, and this will create a new vehicle of intergenerational inequality.

    Teachers are never going to be ok - we’re “essential workers”, and we all know what that means. Our students though, they believe their actions are buying them a better future; when they learn otherwise, they’ll need all the support they can get!




  • Coding is a very… emotional activity. We get a bit salty sometimes.

    I remember commenting a particularly bad routine with “Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch’intrate”.

    There are also phrases such as “by the process of offending god, this somehow outputs…” and “This block was written by someone whose sanity was not so much questionable as it was entirely reprehensible - but it works”.

    I also remember doing a search and replace of every instance of the word “fuck” with “[fornicate]” when bringing someone new onto a project.




  • Three magic words - “Open Note Exam”

    Students prep their own notes (usually limited to “X pages”), take them into the exam, gets to use them for answering questions.

    Tests application and understanding over recall. If students AI their notes, they will be useless.

    Been running my exams as open note for 3 years now - so far so good. Students are happy, I don’t have to worry about cheating, and the university remains permanently angry because they want everything to be coursework so everyone gets an AI A ^_^




  • Ehh… Application of a addiction model is somewhat controversial for pornography (the ground seems divided on whether it’s a compulsion or an addiction). Social media, however, is no less controversial (it’s just the media likes to hype this more).

    I will say - the point of a porn site is to sell user data and deliver ads, whereas the point of social media is to keep the user scrolling by any means possible. By its design, the latter cultivates addiction as a clear goal (the goal to scroll is artificially imposed), whereas the case for the former is less clear (the goal to masturbate isn’t something porn created). In essence, one creates a drive and then sates it, whereas another sates an existing drive.

    Honestly, I think, at the moment, we’re on the “violent video games cause violence” stage of the research. In other words, not enough data to decide so the media has decided for us.




  • So, I’ve seen a lot of people who were extremely sharp as PhD students become blunted as soon as 9–5 starts.

    A lot of decline among adults can likely be traced back to increased cognitive load during working hours, which chips away at intelligence over time as folks burn out.

    With kids it’s harder to place, maybe it’s walking the tightrope that is modern social interactions?