Sorry, it’s rare people are not asking for trouble here :)

I mean that any (reasonable) distance travelled at 90km/h will have consumed less fuel than that travelled at 30km/h; given the same car is used, reasonable gear is selected, etc, of course. If there is less fuel consumed, then, naturally, the emissions are lower as well, since that’s just a byproduct of combustion.

While travelling at 90km/h will consume more fuel per unit of time than at 30km/h, the speed increase makes up for that.

No, I’m not.

You’re arguing something else.

It’s a direct correlation. Emissions come from fuel burnt. Less fuel - lower emissions.

Fair enough on the part in bold.

As someone who lives in London, I can say it does come with a caveat - traffic system here are set up by chimpanzees. It makes no sense, none of the three groups - pedestrians, cyclists or drivers - get prioritised. None of the lights are interconnected, so all they bring is annoyance for everyone. I’m an occasional pedestrian, cycling commuter and a (mostly) weekend driver.

TLDR - no wonder the study found that.

I don’t really understand this. Air quality is not affected if it’s electric cars. If it’s about ICE cars - then, in general, efficiency goes up till ~90km/h.

I feel like the limit was lowered for a fake reason and is now suggested to be brought back up for a bad one.

I think looking for a parking space in what is, effectively, a lorry - is a bit of a waste of energy. It will only fit into >=4 spots anyway, might as well just stop wherever you need. You’ll be a hated by everyone anyway.

Not taking a piss - are they legal in EU to drive on a B cat license?

There is no AI.

What’s sold as an expert is actually a delusional graduate.

Mostly agree, but as someone who has been hosting my own email for years I can tell it is, in fact, better.

Quick note for hosting one on a residential IP - that would no longer piss any ISP off. You would simply not deliver anything anywhere due to IP being blacklisted by default.

Your comment made no sense at first. And then I checked comment counts on other instances 😀

No drama in this corner of the fediverse :)

Now you can insta-copy files on the same filesystem, and they can share blocks with each other without being a mirrored hardlink.

Could you elaborate on this a bit? To my understanding hard links already are the same file, it is only the inode that’s different.

Do you genuinely think you’re the first one on the internet trying to do this? RTFM.

117 votes cast and no comments? What’s going on? Is it that this article has already done a few rounds and this attempt is too soon?