Apparently some artificial sweeteners can act as a laxative. So effectively, those gummy bears were strong laxatives, leading to anybody who eats one to have to spend a long time on the toilet.

I’d also make it so that 5% of your net worth is added to your annual pay for calculations.

The fine should be three days salary, per km/h you’re over. On open country, that is. In a school zone, it should be five dayfines per kilometer over the limit.

They buy it at a store.

As far as I know, this currently isn’t technically feasible. So it’s likely to scam investors.

So annoying

Those two words describe about every ad on youtube.

And how do you know LLMs can’t tell that they are involved in a conversation?

It has no memory, for one. What makes you think that it does know its in a conversation?

LLM based chatbots have a lot of well documented shortfalls, and more generally, what is being promised is not what is being observed. If you also consider that none of the big players in the AI space are offering their product at a price where they could ever hope to break even, it’s reasonable to assume that a market correction is incoming.

Just like NFTs.

That does not follow. I can’t speak for you, but I can tell if I’m involved in a conversation or not.

It allows us to conclude that an LLM doesn’t “think” about what it is saying. Based on the mechanics, the LLM doesn’t even know it’s a participant in the conversation.

Well, the neural network is given a prefix (series of tokens) and a token, and it spits out how likely is it that the token follows the prefix. Text is generated by calculating this probability for all known tokens, then picking one random, weighted based on the calculated probabilities.

The burden of proof is on those who say that LLMs do think.

No, it is not security through obscurity. It’s a message signature algorithm, which are used in cryptography all the time.

Yes it is. The scheme is that when you take a picture, the camera signs said picture. The key is stored somewhere in the camera. Hence the secrecy of the key hinges on the the attacker not knowing how the camera accesses the key. Once the attacker knows that, they can get the key from the camera. Therefore, security hinges on the secrecy of the camera design/protocol used by the camera to access the key, in addition to the secrecy of the key. Therefore, it is security by obscurity.

That’s security by obscurity. Given time, an attacker with physical access to the device will get every bit data from it. And yes, you could mark it as compromised, but then there’s nothing stopping the attacker from just buying another camera and stripping the key from that, too. Since they already know how. And yes, you could revoke all the keys from the entire model range, and come up with a different puzzle for the next camera, but the attacker will just crack that one too.

Hiding the key on the camera in such a way that the camera can access it, but nobody else can is impossible. We simply need to accept that a photograph or a video is no longer evidence.

The idea in your second paragraph is good though, and much easier to implement than your first one.

Trump has done many things for Gaza. Great, beautiful things you wouldn’t believe. So much investment planned. Beautiful Trump resort will be build.

I paid of my student loans by living in Germany and having middle income parents, thus never actually having borrowed anything.