Then just return a 500 - Server error. Nice and obscure.
The ability to separate “something wrong with what you sent” (4XX) and “something wrong on the server” (5XX) is very valuable in itself.
Then just return a 500 - Server error. Nice and obscure.
The ability to separate “something wrong with what you sent” (4XX) and “something wrong on the server” (5XX) is very valuable in itself.
As long as people keep giving them money they will keep pushing deadlines.
When people stop they will stop making and running the game.
A strange game, the only winning move is not to play.
Only if it’s a cow
Would pass first validation, but fail when we try to send an email.
Successfully failed.
if i can email them and the user gets it - fine by me
This is the way.
Almost correct. ^.+@.+$
Too hard to validate properly to be worth it. Even if it is technically valid that’s insufficient. It must also work, and the easiest way to test that is to use it and verify that the user got what we sent.
I don’t validate emails, I test them.
That’s your email? OK, what did we send it? if we couldn’t send to it or the user can’t read it there’s no reason to accept it.
OK, maybe I do some light validation first, but I don’t trust the email address just because it’s email-address-shaped.
The day the nazi died - chumbawamba
And every one of those is delicious. I wonder what the originator tastes like.
vscode with edamagit and the cli
Computing: invented by an incredible clever gay guy to fight nazis.
Honour his legacy.
Norwegian here. The Danes licquorice consumption does not impress.
The Finns, however… Scary people.
JSON is valid YAML does not imply that YAML is valid JSON
Valid JSON is valid YAML.
So valid YAML can contain JSON
please share this list of words and communities!
you think Oracle cares about petitions?
So that’s were that weird smell is coming from.
Please, please, please, PLEASE return error-codes and problem-details.
Here’s the RFC: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9457.html