I answered your question of if my objection was about the subjugation of women, and I pointed out how subjugating women is the problem.

Agreed. I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.

Pretty abusive, isn’t it?

Based on one comment? You’re pulling that out of your ass because confronting your own inconsistencies makes you uncomfortable. Feel free to stalk my comment history of you want.

Also way to tell on yourself that you don’t respect women’s rights.

Call me whatever you want, I believe women should have equal rights.

That’s not the point.

Then, according to that logic, not a single person who believes in a mainstream/typical religion is consenting to it, because many families and communities will shun you if you leave their religion.

Yep! It’s truly horrific, isn’t it? If there is an omnipotent god, why do the teachings need to be spread by force an violence by humans? That doesn’t seem very omnipotent to me…

Bonk

Again, consent under duress is not consent. You can’t consent to a religion if leaving it causes you to be shunned by your family and community.

Then why can’t people consent in the other direction?

Everywhere has religious people that think they deserve to control others.

It’s an easy one-sentence way to point out the inherent subjugation of women.

Consent under duress or desperation is not consent. That’s why I’m pointing out that if the polygamy only ever goes one way, there is an obvious power imbalance that prevents consent from being possible.

Unfortunately that’s not how diseases work. This impacts everyone human in the world :(

You literally asked a question. This symbol: “?” at the end of a sentence indicates a question. It is called a question mark.

Welcome to lemmy. It’s a collection of federated communities. This community is hosted on lemmy.world, which employs similarly heavy-handed moderation tactics to Reddit.

However, like all lemmy instances the moderators are rather short-staffed so you’ll probably be fine unless someone goes out of their way to report your comment.

Unconstitutional is unconstitutional. There is no grey area here.

Find me just one example of a Muslim woman with two husbands.

Politics impacts everyone, with no exceptions.

To prove empirically that he is a king and the constitution is dissolved.