Was going to comment this, albeit less elaborate.

Also, if lines don’t make difference because they are both road, I hope you have very fast reflexes when you drive

What I’d guess that the online stores are going to most likely do is have lawyers sit down, review the various countries that they sell games in, write up some list summarizing legal restrictions and embed that into their selling policy

That would be nice, but it’s very much not what we observe now

If it’s low enough resolution, it’s not an infringement /½s

Soon we will be labelling pictures from grammatically challenged people ‘AI’, whilst simultaneously labelling text from people not making enough spelling errors and using things like ellipsis (…) or em dash (—) also ‘AI’

You forgot the thief rogue trying to steal everything from everyone and making them hostile towards the whole party half of the time

No, of course not, it’s not Twitter, it’s Truth /s

Considering this, I would normally treat anything said about secret weapons a bluff. But given who’s talking, I’ve no way to tell if it’s stupidity instead

The author claims to be an expert in Rust, so at least they don’t come from a standpoint of ‘I hate Rust and everyone who recommends it’ which seems to be somewhat popular

I almost agree, but I think that supporting old hardware practically forever would be a nice thing to have.

Luckily, it doesn’t evolve anymore and given time Rust will likely have that support if it would be necessary for its role in the kernel.

Now age verification should be added to the list, especially if you want to browse 18+ sites like about how to pay taxes or learn to drive

I find it sweet when a cat brings toys to the bed, mine does it sometimes, too, even though it doesn’t play on the bed, because we discourage this 😅

My cat sometimes brings toys because it wants to play. That doesn’t happen too often, though

If we’re vulgar materialists, then it follows that there is no free will, and thus no reason to advocate for societal change.

No free will doesn’t imply no change. Lifeless systems evolve over time, take rock formation as an example, it was all cosmic dust at some point. So no, even if we do accept that there is no free will that shouldn’t mean perfect stasis

Yeah, I can totally see pet projects done with this, it would be relatively simple to understand by others, and you can get to know your project through and through.

have no package manager and encourage less code reuse as a shared value

Also, its main goal is understandability, but some stdlib is written in assembly. I mean, this looks like a nice but very niche language, for some small endeavours maybe?

So, if you worked on it first, do you get a discount for watching and helping, because it doesn’t add up?

That’s almost as good as the ones that limit password on the sign-in UI, but not on the sign-up

GPS information from the source

Here, I think you’re being downvoted because you missed one of ð in the

✍️ we need PHP interpreter written in Rust, noted

I’ve toyed with WASM, creating a simple sudoku page, and it did take an empty page, added all the buttons, and then changed them upon user interaction.

I think, I also heard of the DOM modification limitations, but it’s not a hard barrier afaik, there are just some cases where it can’t

But still, doing something in (pure) WASM looks way harder than needed to me