• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 17th, 2022

help-circle







  • Absolutely but even their high end model has just a RK3588S 8-core 64-bit with a Mali-G610 MP4 … and that’s not exactly a powerhouse if you check benchmark with like an i7 which would already be several years old, not even high end.

    This is not a “fair” comparison and yet, in practice if you sit down with that setup and you start to use Blender and Firefox with a tutorial running in the background, it’s going to feel sluggish quickly IMHO.



  • we need a quality/seamless way of running Android apps on Linux

    Like Waydroid? There was a thread recently on that and it seemed (even though not necessarily a representative sample) most people used it for… games, not “actual” applications. They were NOT used for banking apps also (at least I don’t remember anybody mentioning that) because I bet most people just go on their bank website for that.


  • I don’t have that need but if I were to do that I would

    • boot normally
    • identify which applications I want
    • make a directory on the USB stick calls Apps/ and put them there
    • I would run them from there directly, not copy them then run
    • I would check which files are created in my home directory (e.g. using find filtering by files created during the last 5 minutes)
    • I would stop the run apps, move the new files to my USB in a new directory named content/
    • I would reboot, mount USB stick, move files from content/ in the right location, run the app from Apps/ and see if it works

    Assuming that would work I would make a (bash) script to automate all that, probably relying on rsync and find. I would then try to find ways to automate more with USB rules (namely mount the right USB stick automatically, run the script too, unmount prior to shutdown, etc).

    My main point being that I’d be iterative about it, try, test, document as live script and try again because it’s quite a specific use case.


  • I can’t talk for others I’m personally interested in Linux phones (I have 2, PinePhone and PinePhone Pro) because I do not want to rely on Android because it’s lead, maintained and basically in practice owned by Google.

    I would also much prefer to have “just” Linux because I know it better and because IMHO we reached a point, already few years ago, where “mobile” does not mean much anymore. “just” a computer with a battery is enough due to the power available.

    IMHO the SteamDeck is the existence proof of that.

    Linux desktop apps are not exactly secure.

    Can you please clarify?


  • The instant any such report were to be made public anybody who cares about privacy would switch to another DNS.

    I’m not saying it’s not possible, or won’t happen, but rather the barrier to switch is so low I have a hard time anybody would accept that “compromise”.


  • Maybe I’m missing something but the EU isn’t mandating ISPs to use this DNS.

    Here it’s up to anybody, if they want to, to use this DNS instead of their ISPs, or NextDNS, or corporate Americans alternatives e.g. Google Public DNS or Cloudflare’s. I don’t think any average citizen, in EU or elsewhere, is directly hitting on ICANN’s servers.


  • dns0.eu is a French non‑profit organization founded in 2022 by Romain Cointepas and Olivier Poitrey — co-founders of NextDNS.”

    whereas

    “Supported by the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the European Union’s DNS4EU secure-infrastructure project”

    so AFAICT the 1st is by (EU) citizens with the technical expertise and selling a related product whereas the 2nd is by the public EU administration.



  • Debian stable.

    I don’t understand the “fetish” (for lack of a better word) with updates. Apologies for being provocative.

    The only update one truly needs are :

    • hardware support … but then the process is flipped, namely buy hardware that IS already supported
    • security updates for actually important problems e.g. Heartbleed, not theoretically fancy things like BluePilling out of containers

    … that’s it!

    Everything else might “feel” nice but that’s not up to the distribution. If you want the very latest Blender because you are a 3D artist who needs a very specific feature, get the latest Blender! Get it straight from them, NOT from your distribution. If you really REALLY want the bleeding age, get right from the code repository, get the binaries for your architecture, heck even build it yourself it’s actually rarely that difficult. Maybe the first time you will need some dependencies but the 2nd time it will be way WAY easier.

    Anyway… you get he idea, IMHO your system should be 99.99% boring, only necessary changes. For the few things you genuinely, actively, mindfully NEED (even if it’s just due to curiosity) go wild, get the latest!


  • Maybe I misunderstood but the vulnerability was unknown to them but the class of vulnerability, let’s say “bugs like that”, are well known and published by the security community, aren’t there?

    My point being that if it’s previously unknown and reproducible (not just “luck”) is major, if it’s well known in other projects, even though unknown to this specific user, then it’s unsurprising.

    Edit: I’m not a security researcher but I believe there are already a lot of tools doing static and dynamic analysis. IMHO It’d be helpful to know how those perform already versus LLMs used here, namely across which dimensions (reliability, speed, coverage e.g. exotic programming languages, accuracy of reporting e.g. hallucinations, computation complexity and thus energy costs, openness, etc) is each solution better or worst than the other. I’m always wary of “ex nihilo” demonstrations. Apologies if there is benchmark against existing tools and if I missed that.