• Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Remember when libs kept promising us the military would never use violence against the American people? Remember how they said if a tyrant became president the military would refuse orders to harm fellow Americans?

    God it would be funny if there wasn’t a literal genocide that needed to be ended first.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      "Remember when libs kept promising us the military would never use violence against the American people? "

      Was this before or after the Kent State Massacre?

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    To me, this looks like yet another sign that the current regime is striving for tyranny. That, in turn, would probably mean civil war, unless US citizens are willing to accept the end of democracy.

    At least, that’s how it looks to me, a European. Do you feel the same way?

    I mean, it’s pretty obvious that the US government doesn’t care about the law. And then, to top it all off, there’s this ridiculous military parade for Drump’s birthday … only someone with dictator ambitions would do something like that.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Remember! They wouldn’t do this if they didn’t think they had to - this government action comes from a place of weakness, not strength.

    • companero [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      They don’t have to, though. There’s a vast army of pigs in California. Way more than enough to handle protests of this scale.

      They’re doing this because they want to.

      • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Some of the cities are sanctuary cities and the mayors have ordered the local PD to stand down and not join ICE/DHS.

        Bringing in the National Guard is a way to circumvent that and get ICE reinforcements without having to do the slow legal confrontations to dismantle what’s left of sanctuary cities

      • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        They know that as the empire continues to fall and their overreach begins to affect more lives, protests will grow.

        The standard pigs can handle what we have now, they can’t handle what is to come.

        Whether this move is to pre-empt a coming change of the “big beautiful bill” that guts medicare/medicaid and other social programs, an even broader “sweeping net” policy on immigration, direct hostilities with Iran/China, something else, or all of the above…

        They are predicting a broad national outrage over something.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        A few protests can be handled by cops, what they’re scared of is a repeat of the BLM uprisings. They’re trying to get ahead of the problem before it spreads to every city.

        • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          BLM spread because of police brutality and overreactions. If they are trying to “get ahead of it” by escalating into extreme violence quickly it will only escalate the protests faster.

          The way to “get ahead” of BLM and actually subvert it is to do what Joe Biden and the Democrats did. Coopt the peaceful elements of the movement into the corporate, NGO and DNC controlled sphere, alienate and isolate the radicals, give promises of reforms and then never do anything. Every heavy handed thing the Trump administration did only made the protests in 2020 worse for them and empowered the radicals.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I didn’t say it would work, I’m just saying that this is their plan. Make people too afraid to protest.

            That’s clearly their plan for the anti-genocide protests, after all.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      No it comes from long experience of knowing they will get away with it.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    OoooooooooK. So, who wants to start a betting pool on which day this week we get martial law? Price is Right rules?

    Imma say Tuesday.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    These people are TOAST! If the Wanted to ACTUALLY Peacefully Protest they SHOULD have just BROKEN the CAPITOL WINDOWS, BEATEN CAPITOL POLICE, POOPED ON THE CAPITOL WALLS and USED WEAPONS!

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          I’m sure black people didn’t foresee how standing next to white supremacists was in any way helpful during WWII, or capitalists standing next to communists, or Christians standing next to Muslims, but it was necessary.

          It’s basic history. You’re going to have to figure out how to stand with people you don’t like very much, as much as you enjoy the ‘leopards ate your face’ jokes.

          Though after the last six months, I imagine Democrats would rather hide in a bunker making ‘leopards ate your face’ jokes or writing sternly-worded letters than actually defeat fascism anyway.

          • CXORA@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Your analogies make sense if you identify a common enemy. We do not have a common enemy. They are directly supporting the enemy.

            If you have anything more concrete to point to to explain your point I’m absolutely stumped.